Keenuts added a comment. In D155978#4639094 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D155978#4639094>, @mpaszkowski wrote:
> @Keenuts Hi Nathan, thanks for the patch! I agree with your approach and I > think that this solution despite being a "hack" seems to be the most > straightforward. Eventual differences could be handled in the backend. I > would be open for other solutions in the future (for example in case other > targets would also stumble upon a similar dilemma), but this looks like a > completely valid approach to me. Thanks! Do you know how we can get this merged? (we have no commit access on our end). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D155978/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D155978 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
