cor3ntin marked an inline comment as done.
cor3ntin added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h:2730-2734
+DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT(CXXDefaultInitExpr, {
+ if (getDerived().shouldVisitImplicitCode())
+ TRY_TO(TraverseStmt(S->getExpr()));
+})
+
----------------
Note this is one of the reasons we didn;t get better diagnostics. It's adding
there assuming this was an oversight.
Indeed, i see no reason CXXDefaultInitExpr should not be traversed if
CXXDefaultArgExpr should.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155175/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155175
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
