Fznamznon added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-consteval-default-params.cpp:48
-struct InitWithLambda {
- int b = [](int error = undefined()) { // expected-error {{cannot take
address of consteval function 'undefined' outside of an immediate invocation}}
+struct InitWithLambda { // expected-note {{'InitWithLambda' is an immediate
constructor because the default initializer of 'b' contains a call to a
consteval function 'undefined' and that call is not a constant expression}}
+ int b = [](int error = undefined()) { // expected-note {{undefined
function 'undefined' cannot be used in a constant expression}}
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
> Fznamznon wrote:
> > Maybe it makes sense to print `InitWithLambda::InitWithLambda` so it looks
> > same as "call to immediate function ... is not a constant expression"
> > message and makes it more obvious.
> I don't disagree but for some reason default constructors are printed that
> way... I'd have to make the diagnostics even more complicated and it did not
> feel worth it.
Ok, I see! Yes, I don't feel that making it more complicated is worth it too.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155175/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155175
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
