capfredf added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:304 +llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<Interpreter>> +Interpreter::createForCodeCompletion( + IncrementalCompilerBuilder &CB, const CompilerInstance *ParentCI, ---------------- v.g.vassilev wrote: > I still do not entirely understand why we can "just" ask the codecompletion > infrastructure for the possible options at the current position. I know > that's probably easier set than done but I'd like to entertain that idea for > a while.. I'm a bit confused. Can you expand on the suggestion? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
