mstorsjo added a comment. In D152318#4402493 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318#4402493>, @haowei wrote:
> In D152318#4402234 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318#4402234>, @mstorsjo > wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm curious about where you need `llvm-strings` in a MinGW setting. >> While it does match a GNU binutils tool, I'm kinda curious where it is >> needed. > > llvm-strings exists in the `output_dir/bin` from a local llvm-mingw build > using the scripts in your repo. So I think we might need it. I didn't dig > into it why it exists in the first place. The current effort is to replicate > the results. If it is not required I think there is no harm to added to > Fuchsia's Clang configuration. > > We are trying to build and setup a automated builder for llvm-mingw project > using Fuchsia's Clang toolchain (instead of a pinned version of LLVM from > llvm-mingw's build script) and using it to build some Windows host tools. Ok, I see. Yeah there's not much effort in providing it. I tried digging in to see when I added it, and it seems I added it in https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/commit/55e8aef024faa83c17e18ece15c191bbc1ab7936, without any specific explanation why this particular tool was added, so I guess I added it mostly for completeness. In any case, it doesn't hurt to include it for consistency. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
