haowei added a comment. In D152318#4402234 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318#4402234>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> FWIW, I'm curious about where you need `llvm-strings` in a MinGW setting. > While it does match a GNU binutils tool, I'm kinda curious where it is needed. llvm-strings exists in the `output_dir/bin` from a local llvm-mingw build using the scripts in your repo. So I think we might need it. I didn't dig into it why it exists in the first place. The current effort is to replicate the results. If it is not required I think there is no harm to added to Fuchsia's Clang configuration. We are trying to build and setup a automated builder for llvm-mingw project using Fuchsia's Clang toolchain (instead of a pinned version of LLVM from llvm-mingw's build script) and using it to build some Windows host tools. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152318 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
