jyknight added a comment. > This makes ``CXX11`` and ``C2x`` spellings > unsuitable for attributes that affect the type system, that change the > binary interface of the code, or that have other similar semantic meaning.
Yes, standard attributes aren't supposed to be used for things which affect the type system (although, we certainly have many, already, which do, since we expose most GCC-syntax attributes also as C++-standard attribute syntax!) But I think the C++ standard `[[no_unique_address]]` attribute is ample precedent that standard-attributes may validly affect ABI. `[[no_unique_address]]` may indeed be ignored without changing the validity of a program -- but it does change the ABI. So, if you care for ABI compatibility between compilers, all the compilers you're using need to agree on whether they ignore it or not. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148700/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148700 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
