rsandifo-arm added a comment. Hi @jyknight , @rsmith
Do you have any more thoughts on the above? Quick version is: 1. Is it OK to have `[[…]]` attributes in the `arm` namespace that affect semantics? 2. Is it OK to raise an error for unrecognised attributes in the `arm` namespace (for a measure of future-proofing)? Given the differing views, I'm unsure whether to revert the series and do (1) (and possibly (2)), or whether to leave things as they are. Thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D148700/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D148700 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits