cjdb added a comment.

In D147717#4395204 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717#4395204>, @Fznamznon wrote:

> In D147717#4393019 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717#4393019>, @cor3ntin 
> wrote:
>
>> I think we should make sure to land this for clang 17. The rate of consteval 
>> bugs is no greater than that of any other feature at this point.
>
> There is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62886 which seems quite 
> ugly, but has a patch on review.
> Otherwise I agree, I'm not seeing more consteval bugs than any others.
> @aaron.ballman , @erichkeane wdyt about landing it?

The worst-case scenario is that we have to disable the status again. I can't 
give an estimate on when I'll finish, so this is fine to me based on available 
data.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to