cjdb added a comment. In D147717#4395204 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717#4395204>, @Fznamznon wrote:
> In D147717#4393019 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717#4393019>, @cor3ntin > wrote: > >> I think we should make sure to land this for clang 17. The rate of consteval >> bugs is no greater than that of any other feature at this point. > > There is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62886 which seems quite > ugly, but has a patch on review. > Otherwise I agree, I'm not seeing more consteval bugs than any others. > @aaron.ballman , @erichkeane wdyt about landing it? The worst-case scenario is that we have to disable the status again. I can't give an estimate on when I'll finish, so this is fine to me based on available data. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D147717 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
