hazohelet added a comment. In D151720#4383098 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D151720#4383098>, @tbaeder wrote:
> Can you show the output for an example where the `->` notation is correct, > e.h. https://godbolt.org/z/6a5oExjME ? > > I suppose the patch doesn't change this much, but the current way that's > displayed (`&{*new Foo#0}->zomg()`) is... questionable. The output for that code becomes source.cpp:20:12: note: in call to '{*new Foo#0}.zomg()' F->zomg(); ^ source.cpp:28:17: note: in call to 's.heh()' static_assert(s.heh()); ^ , which I think is still not good. But, at least `(*new Foo).zomg()` would be syntactically valid. I'll check the reason for the use of curly bracket and `#number` notations. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D151720/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D151720 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
