erichkeane added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp:994
+static_assert(sobj.f(), ""); // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note {{in call to 'sobj.f()'}}
+static_assert(sptr->f(), ""); // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note {{in call to 'sobj.f()'}}
+static_assert(slref.f(), ""); // expected-error {{constant expression}}
expected-note {{in call to 'sobj.f()'}}
----------------
So I think this is just trading 1 'wrong' for another. We should be looking to
see if we can figure out whether this is called with an arrow or not. I don't
have a good way of doing that unfortunately, but perhaps Aaron has an idea?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151720/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D151720
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
