hazohelet added a comment.
In D146358#4230122 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358#4230122>, @simideveloper
wrote:
> hey, I was working on the same issue so can we collaborate on this issue?
@simideveloper Thanks for your interest in collaborating on this issue, and
sorry if I discouraged you from contributing by working on the same problem.
I assume this patch is in the its final stage, awaiting feedback on wording.
However, there's more room for improvement around the uninitialized subobject
diagnostics of clang, and your experience working on this issue could be
helpful in resolving those issues.
One example of further improvement:
struct Type1 { int val; }; // note emitted
struct Derived {
Type1 val; // we could note on this as well
constexpr Derived(){}
};
constexpr Derived D;
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/v3rhz88aM
I am open to future collaboration opportunities as well. Happy hacking!
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
