cjdb added a comment. In D146358#4204412 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358#4204412>, @tbaeder wrote:
> "subobject named 'foo'" sounds a bit weird to me, I'd expect just "subobject > 'foo'", but that's just a suggestion and I'll wait for a native spearker to > chime in on this. My expert brain likes `subobject of type 'T'`, but it's very wordy, and potentially not useful additional info. I'm partial to `subobject 'T'` due to it being the thing we're more likely to say in conversation (e.g. "that `int` isn't initialised"). I've also put out a mini-survey on the #include <C++> Discord server, and will update in a few hours. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146358 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
