mboehme marked 4 inline comments as done. mboehme added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23353#511362, @Prazek wrote:
> I will review it later, but my first thoughts: > > 1. I think we should make some other group, because misc seems to be > overloaded. I discussed it with Alex months ago - something like bugprone > would be good. Agree that "misc" seems pretty overcrowded. I'll defer to those who have been working on clang-tidy longer than me to make this call. > 2. Also it would be good to make link in cppcoreguidelines. How exactly would I create such a "link"? Are you just thinking of a link in the documentation, or is there a way to have one clang-tidy check activate another (and is this what you're thinking of)? https://reviews.llvm.org/D23353 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
