aaron.ballman added a comment.
Want to add a release note for this as well?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1886-1889
+ case Sema::NC_Concept:
case Sema::NC_VarTemplate:
case Sema::NC_FunctionTemplate:
case Sema::NC_UndeclaredTemplate: {
----------------
Would this change make sense, to validate that we're still consuming the token
in these three cases? I think it was an assumption we made previously, but it's
not clear to me if the code used to consume something other than `<` as well.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Parser/cxx-template-template-recovery.cpp:5
+ template <typename T>
+ concept C1 = true; //expected-note {{here}}
+
----------------
Totally minor nit, but the same should be changed throughout the file.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146719/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D146719
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
