xazax.hun added a comment. In D146591#4213614 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146591#4213614>, @sammccall wrote:
> (e.g. does the MLIR dataflow framework have the same idea about how the > analysis timeline relates to the CFG and elements within it? And if we want > to show the clang AST or the StorageLocation/Value graph, what's the > non-clang::dataflow-coupled way to model that?) These are good questions. In D146591#4213614 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D146591#4213614>, @sammccall wrote: > Do you think that's valuable? In case it does not add too much complexity on your side I think it is valuable. In case someone wants to use the same visualization for their tool it would be on them to figure out how to generalize the visualization part. On the other hand, even if we never get new users for the visualization, a JSON file will make it easier to build new diagnostic tools for the dataflow framework. One could even do one-off python scripts to help debugging a specific issue. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D146591/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D146591 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
