dmgreen added a comment. > I’ll take a look, but this indicates to me that there’s something missing > from the vectoriser or later passes rather than a problem with the inliners > behaviour.
Sure. I'm not saying that this patch is wrong. I'm just saying that unfortunately it leads to some pretty large regressions. Hopefully we can figure out why and put fixes in place instead of just bodging the tests. Hopefully it's just some missing fold to get the code into the same form it was before, after all the inlining has happened. I took a look at one of the other cases, it appears to be a pretty unfortunate case of the load order in loops leading to LSR not recognizing chains of instructions due to them being order with offsets [2,0,6,4,10,8,..], as opposed to the order they were in before [0,2,4,6,8,10...], which was an easier to reason about. https://godbolt.org/z/Grv64xoxW. I'm not sure exactly what the best way to fix that would be, without making other cases worse. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D143624/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D143624 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
