aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279#510002, @omtcyfz wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279#509896, @compnerd wrote: > > > If the argument really is that we want to minimize the tools then Id argue > > that `clang-rename` also belongs in `clang-tidy` as it would be used to > > rename fields to match the naming convention (tidying up your code base). > > > It does not belong to `clang-tidy`. `clang-tidy` is a linter, it is meant for > diagnosing and fixing typical programming errors. We have the modernize and readability modules which don't really deal with programming errors at all (for some definition of programming error). Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D23279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
