aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D141925#4073405 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141925#4073405>, @courbet wrote:

> In D141925#4073385 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141925#4073385>, @aaron.ballman 
> wrote:
>
>> You also need to add the new matcher to Registry.cpp so it's usable from the 
>> dynamic matchers, and you should add a release note for the new matcher.
>
> Thanks, will do.
>
>> (We don't usually add new matchers until there's a need for them given how 
>> expensive AST matchers are on compile times.)
>
> Ah, that's too bad.
>
>> Are you planning to use this matcher in-tree for something?
>
> I was going to use it out-of-tree but figured it's a nice thing to have as 
> many matchers as possible available for common use. There's also always the 
> use case of people using clang-query (typically through godbolt).
>
> I can live with the matcher being out-of-tree though, so you decide :)

I'd say let's leave it off for now -- if we find an in-tree need at some point, 
we can definitely add it then.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D141925/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D141925

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to