mgorny added a comment. In D141581#4072692 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141581#4072692>, @kwk wrote:
> In D141581#4071617 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141581#4071617>, @thesamesam > wrote: > >> This is currently holding back further testing on our end which is >> concerning me a bit, especially as we approach the branch point. Could you >> revert this please if a fix isn't imminent? Thank you! > > @thesamesam what do you mean with "revert"? Just by looking at this > differential I cannot see that this patch has landed. Has it? He was referring to reverting ac1ffd3caca12c254e0b8c847aa8ce8e51b6cfbf <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGac1ffd3caca12c254e0b8c847aa8ce8e51b6cfbf>, i.e. the change that introduced the problem. However, FWICS reverting it is non-trivial and will probably cause quite a mess. So, well, we're stuck for two weeks now being unable to test new LLVM versions, the branching point is approaching fast and it's quite likely we'll have to put a lot of effort afterwards to fix everything and request backporting our fixes to 16.x. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D141581/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D141581 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
