erichkeane marked an inline comment as done.
erichkeane added a comment.

In D141954#4060647 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954#4060647>, @philnik wrote:

> In D141954#4060246 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954#4060246>, @erichkeane 
> wrote:
>
>> In D141954#4060244 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954#4060244>, @philnik 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In D141954#4060212 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954#4060212>, @erichkeane 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @ldionne @Mordante  The libcxx failure isn't clear what it is complaining 
>>>> about, but I thought this fix might end up breaking a libcxx test, since 
>>>> it would be easy to fall into the trap of having an implicit conversion 
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> Any chance you could prod at that test a little and see whose fault it is?
>>>>
>>>> ALSO: NOTE TO SELF: need release note!
>>>
>>> I think the problem is that `__type_traits/common_reference.h` doesn't 
>>> re-export `__type_traits/common_type.h` in the modulemap. It //should// be 
>>> enough to add `export common_type` to `module common_reference` 
>>> (`libcxx/include/module.modulemap.in:1399`). See `module is_arithmetic` for 
>>> an example. This is just a guess though, this stuff can be very weird.
>>
>> Oh man, I hope the others know what you're talking about :)  I don't really 
>> know how I caused this though :/
>
> I've applied your patch locally and this diff fixes the issue:
>
>   diff --git a/libcxx/include/module.modulemap.in 
> b/libcxx/include/module.modulemap.in
>   index 5d4cf53aa334..30209b353d6b 100644
>   --- a/libcxx/include/module.modulemap.in
>   +++ b/libcxx/include/module.modulemap.in
>   @@ -747,7 +747,10 @@ module std [system] {
>          module assignable                 { private header 
> "__concepts/assignable.h" }
>          module boolean_testable           { private header 
> "__concepts/boolean_testable.h" }
>          module class_or_enum              { private header 
> "__concepts/class_or_enum.h" }
>   -      module common_reference_with      { private header 
> "__concepts/common_reference_with.h" }
>   +      module common_reference_with      {
>   +        private header "__concepts/common_reference_with.h"
>   +        export type_traits.common_reference
>   +      }
>          module common_with                { private header 
> "__concepts/common_with.h" }
>          module constructible              { private header 
> "__concepts/constructible.h" }
>          module convertible_to             { private header 
> "__concepts/convertible_to.h" }
>
> I don't know why your patch changes the behaviour of clang here, but I 
> wouldn't worry too much about it. There is a lot of weirdness around modules 
> and dependent type names resulting in pretty much useless error messages. I 
> hope the work on C++ modules reduces this weirdness, but I don't really know 
> how that stuff works.

Thanks!  I'll apply that patch here and see if it makes the bot happy.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D141954

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to