klimek added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D22505#503472, @LokiAstari wrote:
> I don't have a problem changing it so the default behaviour is:
>
> class C {
> int v1;
> private:
> int v2;
> };
>
>
> But I would like to retain the functionality that if there is no explicit
> public/private/protected that it follows the original.
> But if there is huge objection to that I am not going to fight over this one
> (I can live with the indention above).
That should already be doable with a negative offset today, right?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22505
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
