MaskRay added a comment. In D140224#4014243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D140224#4014243>, @rsundahl wrote:
>> I'll reject [-\Xparser for a while as well. This is a valid amendment to >> D139717 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139717> , so I don't think it needs more >> approval. > > We have projects that are failing because of -Xlinker and I'm not too excited > about walking through every project we have to find more examples. Can we > please have a reprieve on deprecating this until every project in the world > that uses these flags that have existed for a very long time can have a > chance to at least get timely notification? Why is this any different than > anything else that gets deprecated? Thank you for your reply! If there are more issues -Xlinker/-Xparser/-Xcctests, ok, I think I'm fine with a Joined -X, but ideally we can figure out a way to apply that only to Apple platforms. (FWIW I feel sad when I made valid objection to D139717 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D139717>, but that patch landed very soon after your colleague approved it, leaving me no time to object. My other objection included the insufficient commit message `-Xfoo` instead of what's actually used, `internal builds` which seems to hint an internal workaround, where the tests are located) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140224/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
