nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D138078#3931247 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D138078#3931247>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> It looks like `indirectbr-expand` _is_ enabled at `-O0` and is necessary for > correctness IIUC. Thoughts on moving this there, and maybe renaming the pass > to `indirectbr-callbr-expand`? Looks like `indirectbr-expand` isn't run for certain targets...thoughts on where to put this logic? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138078/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138078 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
