aaron.ballman added a comment. In D127762#3930988 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127762#3930988>, @paulwalker-arm wrote:
> Hi @rsandifo-arm , what are your thoughts on Arron's observations? My > interpretation is that Arm originally figured the distinction between > keywords and gnu attributes was minimal and thus using our previous norms > made most sense. This is not my world so my understanding is somewhat naive > but it does sound like Arron has raised some good reasons why keywords are a > better design decision. Do you agree? I wonder if it's worth having this > conversation on https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/pull/123 (unless > Richard has a better link) so we can capture the rational for future design > changes if any. @aaron.ballman, are you ok with this or do you prefer to keep > the design conversation linked to this clang implementation? I'm fine having that conversation on the design document rather than here on the review. We can use links to connect the dots between the design pull request and the phab review. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127762/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127762 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
