shafik added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:1555 + on the indirect branch may result in undefined behavior and should be + avoided. ---------------- void wrote: > shafik wrote: > > It would be helpful to provide an example of what is not supported. If you > > can provide an example that actually results in undefined behavior that > > would be even better. > I added an example, but it's hard to determine whether a given piece of code > will have undefined behavior as it sometimes occurs only on a specific > optimization level. Understood, I think what you have is good. Thank you. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135818/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135818 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
