nickdesaulniers accepted this revision. nickdesaulniers added inline comments. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:1553 + implementation<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html>`_ in + that Clang doesn't support outputs on the indirect branch. Use of an output + on the indirect branch may result in undefined behavior and should be ---------------- Consider adding a link to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53562? Clang doesn't yet support... but support is planned. or something. ================ Comment at: clang/docs/LanguageExtensions.rst:1557 -.. code-block:: c++ - ---------------- Do we need to keep the code block to retain formatting? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135818/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135818 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
