steakhal added a comment. In D135763#3853746 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D135763#3853746>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> This change look good to me. I am not entirely sure about the future plans > though. Me neither. That was just a thought. > We should be able to read the values out from the AST, so we do not need the > store to map memregions to values (as far as the values inside the object are > concerned). That's true. > How to deal with the address of such object is a good question, but a special > symbol or constant might be an alternative to introducing memregions. I'm not sure if we should introduce more and more special cases. We should experiment with some ideas, that's for sure. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D135763/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D135763 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
