rjmccall added a comment. I don't think I agree that changes to template partial ordering rules are "ABI-breaking changes". They're breaking changes to *language semantics*, and the ABI break is downstream of that, just like any other semantic change to overload resolution would be. I think the right approach for Clang is to gate this by language version and add a note somewhere that C++23 changed the overload resolution rules around function templates and that this means adopting C++23 can be ABI-breaking. Fortunately, it should only be ABI-breaking in rare circumstances.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134507/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134507 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
