ychen added a comment. In D134507#3817928 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134507#3817928>, @probinson wrote:
> It feels odd to use a ClangABI check for something that is affecting what > source is accepted, but this is not my area of expertise. > @aaron.ballman or @rjmccall would probably be the right people to weigh in on > this. This was discussed here https://reviews.llvm.org/D128745#inline-1244757. Yeah, it is somewhat confusing to key the legacy language behavior on ClangABI. I'm not sure there are better choices than inventing new flags. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134507/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134507 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
