EricWF added a comment. I'm committing this today, meaning it will make it into 3.9, so don't forget to remove your upstream patches before the release :-)
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21329#476455, @dim wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D21329#475105, @theraven wrote: > > > Looks fine to me, though I wonder if we want to move to the new ABI for > > FreeBSD11 and use the old one for <=10. > > > For 11 it is certainly too late now, since it is ABI/API frozen now, and we > would still need to find some way of providing backwards compat for > applications that were linked against the earlier libc++, which still had the > non-trivial pair copy constructor. I can't think of any way to offer backwards compat for this particular ABI break. Looks like FreeBSD is stuck with this until your allowed to take a total ABI break. Does FreeBSD have a plan for when this might happen? https://reviews.llvm.org/D21329 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
