dim added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21329#475105, @theraven wrote:
> Looks fine to me, though I wonder if we want to move to the new ABI for > FreeBSD11 and use the old one for <=10. For 11 it is certainly too late now, since it is ABI/API frozen now, and we would still need to find some way of providing backwards compat for applications that were linked against the earlier libc++, which still had the non-trivial pair copy constructor. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21329 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits