jhuber6 added a comment. In D131639#3749582 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131639#3749582>, @ivanrodriguez3753 wrote:
> They are defining their own `bool`, which aliases to the built-in `_Bool` > (which is reserved, as you noted with `_[A-Z]`). I thought `bool` was fair > game unless they included `stdbool.h`? You're right, I was reading it wrong. It should be "legal" to typedef something if no one else has done it. I'm still wondering if this is really our fault as it's still likely to conflict. The `<stdbool.h>` header supplies `__bool_true_false_are_defined` exactly for this reason. Can the user not check this locally to prevent re-declaration? I think it's perfectly reasonable to include system files as part of a toolchain. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131639/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
