arsenm added a comment. In D130224#3668243 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130224#3668243>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D130224#3668240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130224#3668240>, @arsenm wrote: > >> In D130224#3668225 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130224#3668225>, >> @aaron.ballman wrote: >> >>> It sounds like there's an extremely specific use case in mind for this >>> attribute; is there a reason why this needs to be the user's problem >>> instead of something the compiler can infer or handle on the backend? >> >> The intended user is a handful of header wrapper functions around >> intrinsics, not general users > > Great, then it sounds like we don't need to expose this as an attribute > because we know which intrinsics need special behavior, so we can handle them > specially at codegen time or within the backend? The problem is the wrappers. We originally talked about specifically handling the builtins, but that falls apart given the real users come from wrapper functions which look like ordinary code Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130224/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
