jhuber6 added a comment.

In D130096#3663062 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096#3663062>, @JonChesterfield 
wrote:

> A safer bet is to use the current control flow that links in specific bitcode 
> files, but create the global directly instead of linking in the file. That'll 
> give us zero semantic change and a clang that ignores those bitcode files if 
> present.

I think I understand what you're saying better now. We should instead have this 
controlled as a flag via `clang` that the driver will add. This will just tell 
us to trigger some backend utility to emit the same code. I can look into doing 
that, will make it easier to just have the clang driver state that we should 
emit this for HIP / OpenMP unless `nogpulib` is passed for example.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to