jhuber6 added a comment. In D130096#3663062 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096#3663062>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> A safer bet is to use the current control flow that links in specific bitcode > files, but create the global directly instead of linking in the file. That'll > give us zero semantic change and a clang that ignores those bitcode files if > present. Do we expect those libraries to be linked per-TU via `-mlink-builtin-bitcode`? The usage I see passes them to `lld` directly. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130096 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
