Anastasia added a comment. In D128012#3592126 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012#3592126>, @beanz wrote:
> In D128012#3592098 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012#3592098>, @Anastasia > wrote: > >> aha, are you having a lot of these types then? Ok that sounds similar >> problem to OpenCL builtin functions as we had to go away from a simple >> header include due to long parsing time. > > Very similar problem. We have a two-part problem where we both have enough of > them that parsing a header would be too slow _and_ the HLSL language actually > can't represent them. The later we're working to fix. My hope is that > eventually we can write the HLSL libraries in HLSL and use a pre-compilation > step (PCH or Module-style) to get past the performance issues. PCH have large in-memory size compared to the sources, but if it's not an issue then it should be reasonable. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128012 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
