aaron.ballman added reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, xgupta. aaron.ballman added a comment.
Thank you for looking into this! I'm adding a few more reviewers for awareness. ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:63 def warn_infinite_recursive_function : Warning< - "all paths through this function will call itself">, + "In order to understand recursion, you must first understand recursion">, InGroup<InfiniteRecursion>, DefaultIgnore; ---------------- A few things: * Diagnostics in Clang are not intended to be grammatically correct, so they don't start with a capital letter or end with a trailing full stop (so if this wording was kept, you should use `in order` instead of `In order`). * While this is a cute way to get the point across, we want the diagnostic to help guide the user as to why their code is wrong so they have the best chance to fix the issue. I think the original wording isn't too bad here because it's lexically associated with the function definition itself (so the "this function" is clear in situ), but I do think "will call itself" is a bit awkward. Perhaps "this function is called recursively on all paths through the function", but I don't feel strongly either. ================ Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-infinite-recursion.cpp:11 else - b(x+1); + b(x + 1); } ---------------- It looks like you formatted the whole file -- we typically try to have the only changes in the patch be specifically about the changes driving the patch, instead of mixing several fixes together into one patch. While it seems a bit less efficient than it could be, having a clean separation eases maintenance burdens for us. If we need to revert a patch for some reason, we don't lose potentially good changes along with the bad ones. But also, it makes it more clear if we need to do a git-blame as to why changes were introduced. You should revert the formatting-specific changes in the file so that the only differences are the functional ones. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127759/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127759 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
