abidmalikwaterloo added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Testing/CMakeLists.txt:29 llvm_gtest + clangBasic + clangFrontend ---------------- shraiysh wrote: > unrelated change? When I rebase, these changes were highlighted in the main branch which was missing in the patch as it was too old. ================ Comment at: mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/OpenMP/OpenMPOps.td:514 + oilist(`schedule` `(` + custom<DistributeScheduleClause>( + $dist_schedule_var, ---------------- shraiysh wrote: > dist_schedule is a dummy clause, where kind is only allowed to be `static` > according to the standard. I don't think that requires a custom function, we > can instead have something like the following - > ``` > arguments = UnitAttr:$static_dist_schedule, > Optional<IntLikeType>:$schedule_chunk > > assemblyFormat = `dist_schedule` `(` (`static` $static_dist_schedule^)? (`:` > $schedule_chunk^)? `)` > ``` > Would that work? Let me know if there are any suggestions. My only concern is; will this be a dummy clause with the static scheduler forever? I am pretty sure dist_schedule will have a dynamic or a user defined scheduling strategy as well to improve the performance of a given application Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105584/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105584 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits