AaronLiu added a comment. In D119136#3465522 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3465522>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> In D119136#3465361 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3465361>, @AaronLiu > wrote: > >> When compile the following valid testcase: >> >> void foo() >> { >> int x = [x](int y[sizeof x]){return sizeof x;}(0); >> } >> >> It will complain: >> >> error: captured variable 'x' cannot appear here >> int x = [x](int y[sizeof x]){return sizeof x;}(0); >> ^ >> >> The issue is also described in: >> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2569.html > > Is that something you encountered in existing code, or where you trying to > write test against this change. > I only implemented the `decltype` part of the proposed resolution, for reason > explained in that link (supporting `sizeof(unqual-id)` and > `noexcept(unqual-id) seems extremely arbitrary). > But hopefully WG21 will come up with a more encompassing fix before we > attempt to re-land this change It is reduced from the existing code. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
