cor3ntin added a comment.
In D119136#3465361 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3465361>, @AaronLiu wrote:
> When compile the following valid testcase:
>
> void foo()
> {
> int x = [x](int y[sizeof x]){return sizeof x;}(0);
> }
>
> It will complain:
>
> error: captured variable 'x' cannot appear here
> int x = [x](int y[sizeof x]){return sizeof x;}(0);
> ^
>
> The issue is also described in:
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2569.html
Is that something you encountered in existing code, or where you trying to
write test against this change.
I only implemented the `decltype` part of the proposed resolution, for reason
explained in that link (supporting `sizeof(unqual-id)` and `noexcept(unqual-id)
seems extremely arbitrary).
But hopefully WG21 will come up with a more encompassing fix before we attempt
to re-land this change
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
