aaron.ballman added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21643#465583, @llvm-commits wrote:
> Should we add overloads of the UTF8 conversion functions that accept > wstrings? I think we should eventually consider cleaning up our Unicode APIs because they're kind of all over the place. For instance, WindowsSupport.h has a different set of APIs for handling Unicode conversions that compete with the ones exposed by ConvertUTF.h. > In line with what rnk said, I'm curious about the implications of simply > #undef'ing all the non A/W versions of functions so that you have to make > the choice explicit I'm not certain I follow along. Are you suggesting we explicitly #undef something like RegQueryValueEx so that you must explicitly call RegQueryValueExW or RegQueryValueExA, as needed? That seems like something that will quickly get forgotten about and not really used. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21643 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
