arcbbb added inline comments.
================ Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp:4683 + Ops.push_back(VL); + Ops.push_back(DAG.getUNDEF(XLenVT)); // Policy + } ---------------- kito-cheng wrote: > Is this operand for tail policy? if so why this is `UNDEF`? I guess this > should be `TAIL_AGNOSTIC` rather than `UNDEF`? Because unmasked pseudos doesn't have a policy operand, TA/TU is distinguished by checking if passthru is undef. I think it is proper to leave undef here. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120449/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120449 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
