asb accepted this revision. asb added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D118333#3329422 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118333#3329422>, @asb wrote: > Thanks, I've put this on the agenda for the RISC-V LLVM sync call today. I > think this is more attractive than the previous proposal due to unifying > logic between llc and Clang. I could see a counter-argument about llc being a > low-level tool that should be controlled very explicitly. I forgot to update on this. Nobody had particularly strong feelings either way, but I think the overall consensus was that this change seemed sensible. Landing this after the LLVM 14 branch also feels like a good time for it. LGTM - thanks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D118333/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D118333 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
