iains marked 2 inline comments as done.
iains added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Module.h:523-524
+  std::string getPrimaryModuleInterfaceName() const {
+    std::string::size_type pos = Name.find(':');
+    if (pos == std::string::npos)
+      return Name;
----------------
iains wrote:
> iains wrote:
> > urnathan wrote:
> > > haven't you added an IsPartition flag to Module? can't you test that 
> > > before searching? Also, Almost Always Auto?
> > 1) The case we are dealing with is
> > 
> > we're building `A{,:B}`
> > we encounter `:Part`
> > 
> > So we do not have a module for the importer ('cos we didn't build it yet) 
> > but we need to know the primary module name for the imported partition 
> > (even to be able to find it).
> > 
> > So it's a wee bit icky, but we are reduced to manipulating text (none of 
> > the content of Module.h is available - we are looking at parser tokens).
> > 
> > 2) auto and StringRefs - yes probably I could do better.
> > 
> > The consolation is that this is not an action we'd reasonably expect to be 
> > carried out many times c.f. other parser jobs - of course, I'll be proven 
> > wrong and someone will import 10^6 partitions ....
> > 
>  
> > (none of the content of Module.h is available - we are looking at parser 
> > tokens).
> 
> maybe I retract that, at least partially,  we do not have a module (built) - 
> but some of the base information is saved in sema when the module decl is 
> built, so we probably do know if we are building `A:B` or just `A`. 
> 
> If we think that this could be a pain point - sema can cache the primary 
> module name and we can then return a StringRef to that.
I've reworked this to use a StringRef - so that the source string components 
are owned by the importing module (which we're building) and then we construct 
a new module name (for the imported module) which we will use to find it.  We 
have enough of the module at this point to do this.



Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D118598/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D118598

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to