Izaron added a comment. In D117435#3247137 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117435#3247137>, @rjmccall wrote:
> I don't remember if this is written up anywhere, but clang has a longstanding > policy that style enforcement belongs in a linter rather than the compiler. > One programmer's "redundant" is another programmer's "clear and explicit". I > don't think this warning is consistent with that. Thanks, didn't know this. Hope I'll make it to clang-tidy then. (There was an abandoned review back in time when "inline" meant "inlinehint" for LLVM IR. https://reviews.llvm.org/D18914) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D117435/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D117435 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
