jackoalan added a comment. > 1. It it possible to limit the new syntax to config files only? It would > avoid concerns of gcc compatibility.
Yes, ultimately this use case only calls for extending config files. > Is it possible to use more understandable designation, like `<CONFIG>` or > something similar? I agree, keyword directives like this would be more flexible in the long term and the use of shell redirection characters would theoretically protect any general purpose word. For now, I think it is acceptable to consume `<CONFIG>` as a singular token, but in the future, generic `<(.*)>` tokenization may be worth adding. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
