sepavloff added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/UsersManual.rst:920 +To generate paths relative to the configuration file, the `<@>` token may be +used. This will expand to the absolute path of the directory containing the ---------------- Response and configuration files are different things, so the documentation must more specific what facility is extended. According to this implementation the response file treatment is extended. During development of configuration files couple of attempts were taken to extend the functionality of response files (see for example https://reviews.llvm.org/D36045). They were rejected as breaking compatibility with gcc. It does not mean that such extending is not possible, but it should be discussed in wider community. There must be serious reason for such extension and significant use case. As for using this feature for configuration files, it does not look as very helpful. Configuration files are searched for in several places and the first found file is used. In this case specification of various locations relative to the config-file does not look neither safe nor natural. Specific use case also would be helpful to ground the need for such extension. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
