yonghong-song added a comment. @aaron.ballman I checked the source. Looks like we can easily get TypeLoc from TypeSourceInfo, but not from TypeSourceInfo to TypeLoc. But We need TypeLoc so we can get attr information and also traverse TypeLoc's.. We might be able to pass TypeSourceInfo in a few functions e.g., createFieldType(), but we still need to do TSI->getTypeLoc() and pass TypeLoc to other functions like getOrCreateType(), createType() etc. So I am inclined to just use TypeLoc.
@dblaikie Based on the discussion so far, I suspect we might have to use TypeLoc. Please let me know what you think. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
