rnk added a subscriber: rjmccall.
rnk added a comment.
So, after reading through Build(Unary|Bin)Op, I think the duplication of logic
between TreeTransform is intentional, and the better fix is to generalize the
existing logic for placeholder handling. If you enter into the Build*Op
codepaths, you will re-run a lot of redundant checks. Maybe +@rjmccall can
provide a second opinion.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h:14572
if (First->getObjectKind() == OK_ObjCProperty) {
BinaryOperatorKind Opc = BinaryOperator::getOverloadedOpcode(Op);
----------------
I notice that ObjC pseudo objects are handled here. Is there a way to unify
things? Can this code be removed if we route builtin operators over to
`Sema::Build(Bin|Unary)Op`?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h:14583
if (Second && Second->getObjectKind() == OK_ObjCProperty) {
ExprResult Result = SemaRef.CheckPlaceholderExpr(Second);
----------------
This is also pseudo object handling code
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111639/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111639
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
